I’ll share a little more awesome, then.

My wife and I rented a rental property using a process where neither the landlord or ourselves used a computer. We saw it advertised in the local weekly newspaper, drove by, and the landlord was cleaning. She hadn’t advertised anywhere else. She asked about criminal history and jobs. But, she didn’t perform background or credit checks. Only after we signed the lease did she ask to take pictures of our government-issued identification. We paid cash for the deposit and first month.

If you don’t like it here, nobody is forcing you to be here.

Your best defense of this event is a red herring, to suggest I find my way out and to engage your alt.

That’s not good. Not good at all.

After decades engaging theory and praxis, after a half dozen books on the specific topic, after suggesting the core text on the topic to you, I now need to watch some fuckhead’s video to explain the basics?

I’m not convinced. Not even a little bit.

You’re the moderator’s alt. Objectively the algorithm says the writing styles are a very good match. Subjectively you’re engaging the same tactic of introducing a red herring.

I see through you like glass. As soon as you realize that you’ll ban me. But, you’ll have no satisfaction because, right now, in this thing, I know you better than yourself.

I’ve many ideas. But, it’s a red herring that I’ll not facilitate.

The topic we’re engaging on is that a moderator should be able to explain who organized the event they’re supporting and why steaming video does not violate basic operational security.

I’ll add that moderators that double down on logical fallacy probably shouldn’t be moderators.

I’m brown. Yesterday, I was moving into a new place and asked a Trump-hat wearing, ex-military boomer what day was trash day. He gave me an explanation of all the good and bad of the neighborhood, told me to use his trash bin this week, and invited my wife and I to dinner. When we showed up his wife asked why we didn’t bring our dog because he’s a member of our family.

Many things I thought I understood about others have recently been nuked by experiences.

Looking forward to your explanation of which leftist organization organized this event and how streaming video facilitates operational security.

Operational Security as taught by every leftist group since at least the mid-1800s.

Manufacturing Consent by Herman and Chomsky.

Replace your video with Revolutionary Suicide by Huey P. Newton.

What kind of person would throw nonsense at a user named ReadMoreBooks and expect anything but having circles run around them?

There’s a big difference between righteously risking action and stupidity.

Every action has a level of risk. Doing nothing is not acceptable.

<ModeratorHat>

I see you.

</ModeratorHat>

Given all the evidence, it would be extremely unwise to attend this event.

The fact that you felt the need to speak as a moderator instead of defeating my claims with the facts and reason you should’ve had before you supported it should serve as a red flag to for yourself and others.

Do NOT attend this event.

No one can identify the organizers. It’s being held without the involvement of any group of organized leftists.

The guidance posted in this thread recommends streaming of video evidence and propagation of that video. This is a blatant violation of operational security.

Revolutionary events are never shared with major media outlets. Major media outlets would not propagate them.

Do NOT attend this event. You WILL be identified by your oppressors. It WILL become a threat to your security. We CANNOT save you from the consequences.

Do NOT attend this event.

My limited experience beginning with having never having been in any gym, ever, until my 40s:

Most adults that are regularly working out in the gym judge the beginners as courageous. They want to teach and encourage them. But, social norms won’t let them until solicited. If a beginner has also the courage to communicate sincerely then they’re likely to find both physiological and psychological support for their personal goals.

This is generally true for most things. Create the opportunity and almost everyone will teach and love as is practical for them.

Perhaps you should limit yourself to reddit and .world.

That makes sense. I’ll give it a try. Thank you for teaching me.

When we want to break hydrocarbon chains we use bases by default. But, I’d not use a base on a bike chain because if it rusts even a little bit it’s junk.

For woodworking why is this better than mineral spirits?

Get the dangerous alkaline concentrate and dilute it as directed for the situation. It’s much cheaper. Whatever environmental concerns are canceled out because 1 gallon was transported instead of 64-128 gallons.

J.S. Mill and M. Foucault beg to differ.

Centrist narcicissim.

I’ve trusted Americans as a whole to do generally the right thing, and that trust has been abused.

You’ve set an impractical expectation. At scale people will, at best, produce average outcomes. It’s more often below average.

Today, choosing the “right” thing is a privilege of time and means. It’s not even a practical choice anymore.

How I felt

You’re worried too much about your feelings. It’s preventing you from discerning wisdom.

The category of chemicals you’re looking for are called de-greasers.