mesamune@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agothe Apple curl security incident 12604 | daniel.haxx.sedaniel.haxx.seexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1160arrow-down14cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1156arrow-down1external-linkthe Apple curl security incident 12604 | daniel.haxx.sedaniel.haxx.semesamune@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square16fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareBrownian Motion@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·1 year agoAnyone still using LibreSSL and not OpenSSL, has only themselves to blame. Or their company or whoever is forcing it on them.
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year agoSeems from the article that LibreSSL is fine, it’s about Apple patches to it.
minus-square0x0@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoOpenBSD forked OpenSSL due to HeartBleed. OpenBSD developers are generally regarded as quite on top of their game when it comes to security, so why the “still using LibreSSL” FUD?
Anyone still using LibreSSL and not OpenSSL, has only themselves to blame. Or their company or whoever is forcing it on them.
Seems from the article that LibreSSL is fine, it’s about Apple patches to it.
OpenBSD forked OpenSSL due to HeartBleed. OpenBSD developers are generally regarded as quite on top of their game when it comes to security, so why the “still using LibreSSL” FUD?