• zenpocalypse@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    And how do you think that’s going to go when suddenly the creator needs to compete with massive corps?

    The reason copyright exists is for the same reason patents do: to protect the little guy.

    Just because corporations abuse it doesn’t mean we throw it out.

    It shouldn’t be long, but it sure should be longer than 5 years.

    Or maybe 5 years unless it’s an individual.

    Edit - think logically. You think the corps are winning now with the current state of copyright? They won’t NEED to own everything without copyright and patent laws. They’ll just be able to make profit off your work without passing any of it to the creator.

    • CodexArcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Oh so like the music industry where every artist retains full rights to their work and the only 3 big publishers definitely don’t force them to sell all their rights leaving musicians with basically nothing but touring revenue? Protecting the little guy like that you mean?

      Or maybe protecting the little guy like how 5 tech companies own all the key patents required for networking, 3d graphics, and digital audio? And how those same companies control social media so if you are any kind of artist you are forced to hustle nonstop on their platforms for any hope if reaching an audience with your work? I’m sure all those YouTube creators feel very protected.

      • zenpocalypse@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Those are problems with the shitty enforcement, and allowing corporations to run rampant.

        It needs to be refined, not removed.

        Without copyright, you could write a novel, and any corp or person could just start publishing it without paying you a dime.

        Just because something isn’t protecting well enough doesn’t mean you get rid of it.

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The reason copyright exists is for the same reason patents do: to protect the little guy.

      If you actually believe this is still true, I’ve got a bridge to sell ya’.

      This hasn’t been true since the '70s, at the latest.

      • zenpocalypse@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        So you believe there is no protection for creators at all and removing copyright will help them?

        • bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I believe that the protection copyright provides is proportionate to how much you can spend on lawyers. So, no protection for the smallest creators, and little protection for smaller creators against larger corporations.

          I support extreme copyright reform, though I doubt it should be completely removed.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The original 14-year duration w/ an optional renewal is pretty fair IMO. That’s long enough that the work has likely lost popularity, but not so long that it’s irrelevant. Renewals should be approved based on need (i.e. I’m currently living off the royalties).

      The current copyright term in the US is utterly atrocious.

      Oh, we should also consider copyright null and void once it’s no longer available commercially for a “reasonable” price. As in, if I can’t go buy the book or movie today for a similar price to the original launch (or less), then you should lose copyright protections.

      • zenpocalypse@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Absolutely. Finally a reply with some sense. This would work well, or at least better.

        The “copyright doesn’t protect anyone so let’s remove it” people are just playing into the hands of big corporations.