Its not nearly big enough to wipe out the planet. Not even close.

It would just cause suffering for thousands/hundreds of thousands of people. Are you OK with that?

Try Grayjay. It supports background playback.

Removed by mod

My experience of existence creates my reality. It stands to reason that its safe to assume that any other biological/living thing with a brain even remotely like mine should also be experiencing a similar form of reality. I’d define the shared experience of being a human on planet earth as a basis of reality. If I am in some sort of sandbox, it seems to me that would be unknowable to the same degree as being able to know what came before the big bang. Because I’m not a physicist, this question is meaningless to me.

The evolutionary process that governs humanity would be my measurement yardstick. AI as we know it cannot spontaneously arise in the universe without humanity as a catalyst. Carbon does not self-assemble into ChatGPT if you know what I mean. Carbon self-assembled into humanity that then assembled ChatGPT through technological advancement.

By that measure it is my opinion that ChatGPT cannot ever achieve consciousness as we know it as without humanity as a maintainer it collapses. Humanity is the consciousness and ChatGPT is a tool that it uses to perform tasks. Any semblance of consciousness is an illusion specifically designed to replicate the nuances of consciousness. Its meant to be human-like in its behaviour and as a result it easily blurs the line for some people.

I’m not a philosopher but this is how I think of it. I can relate to another human’s experiences. I can’t relate to a computer’s experiences. As a result, I don’t accept any argument in favor of AI consciousness and wouldn’t have any qualms on pulling the plug on an AI. Pulling the plug on a human is a completely different story.

No one is going to cry for ChatGPT if it ever dies and no one ever should. Its a tool and should be used as such. Trying to shoehorn consciousness into a computer is nothing but unfettered narcissistic ego-tripping if you ask me.

Insta-fail on spotted should be a difficulty option like in Metal Gear.

That’s a looooot of assumptions and stale assumptions at that.

I think 60FPS is totally fine. 30 is only OK on slower moving games or era-appropriate consoles; Halo on the OG Xbox for example.

In this day and age, anything below 60FPS 1080p is unacceptable. If a new game can’t hit that target on 3 year old hardware, the game is unfinished.

Season 2 sequence is the best I’ve ever seen.

Imagine trying to moderate that shit?

Honestly, AI companies should be focusing on making AI into a good moderation tool so that human eyes don’t need to be the filter for the heinous shit people post on the internet.

Here’s some free speech for you:

Fuck you, Nazi-enabler.

I kinda felt the same until I read the blog a few months back. Now every time I see this face I get excited to read more.

+1 for FUTO. The keyboard and voice to text is awesome.

Yep, you’re 100% right. Not sure why I thought it was high friction. I feel like I confused trying to put an icon for an image on my home screen (gym app’s sign in QR code) with sending a web page to the home screen.

If phone OSes made it so there’s less friction to save a web page as an icon on your desktop it would help to resolve that issue I think.

IIRC that era of iPods had issues with their preamps. I remember when I switched from a Nano to a classic that there was noticeable clipping and other distortion where there wasn’t before. I would have returned it but I had already sold my Nano…

I’d argue you’ve got that backwards; CD is to vinyl what lossless is to .mp3. That said, I know what you mean.

Thanks for the context. I did read the article after I posted my comment. My order of operations is backwards and needs to be fixed lol

Ok, I was very confused for a moment there.

Are you actually arguing in favor of not testing gameplay changes and instead relying on vibes to make the decision for you?