data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33b20/33b20870f6d0ea7e1bacfd49de3c242fd138982f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1df69/1df69f53f5559e83c288e08b403109544e78dc05" alt=""
The EU disallowed it and Meta had to pay a fine for sharing data between Facebook and Instagram. So I hope it won’t happen.
The EU disallowed it and Meta had to pay a fine for sharing data between Facebook and Instagram. So I hope it won’t happen.
I meant from a user perspective. Sending images doesn’t work half of the time, the search is completely useless if you have tens of thousands of messages etc. I use it every day btw.
I really want to like it, but from a technical perspective, it just doesn’t work well tbh.
I’m confused.
In what way?
The only field where it’s actually justified: math. In math, every time has an exact definition behind it, and you have to use the exact term.
Every other year the EU tries to pass another mass surveillance law - and the EU court of human rights rules it illegal.
Just to add some formality to this, the original commenter might want to look up the shell theorem for classical mechanics and Birkhoff’s theorem for general relativity.
Yeah, quantum mechanics lingo: measurement = interaction
Actually a good point, tho. And also a good thought: If there is no special direction, what would be up? And that’s where quantum mechanics gets even weirder: It’s either up or down in the direction you measure.
I had to derive osmotic pressure for my statistical mechanics exam in my bachelor’s. So in what sense don’t we know?
Pretty sure a court told them to.
There’s also WYGIWYW (“What You Get Is What You Want”) and is primarily used for latex, because you give up some manual control for a (allegedly) better looking result.
Wtf? I had a very buggy experience. Maybe it was because I was playing it in multiplayer, but I had glitches every 20 minutes and it crashed like every other hour.
Maybe I just mixed up the fact that proper industrial use is vastly overestimated/overhyped with that there is little use. I will do some research.
I don’t think I was talking about this, interesting. Because in the video I mentioned she was fine with trans athletes competing together with cis athletes, which seemed very progressive to me. But I’m happy to be proven wrong.
Thanks for this productive discourse, not ad hominem at all. You’re welcome to criticize my views and I’m happy to learn. And I am doing my physics masters, so I think I am no complete idiot. But this is also not productive.
Edit: I’m focusing on cosmology, I’m not claiming to be a quantum computing expert. That was just my last state of knowledge and I’m always happy to learn.
Are you talking about her video on trans athletes? I don’t remember it being transphobic.
She might have strong opinions on particle physics and I do take them with a grain of salt, but I don’t see objectively wrong things in there.
Then buy second hand