$10,000 in 1967 is equivalent in purchasing power to about $92,911.98 today, an increase of $82,911.98 over 57 years. The dollar had an average inflation rate of 3.99% per year between 1967 and today, producing a cumulative price increase of 829.12%.
While not A list pay, that’s still not bad and a livable wage, unless I’m missing something obvious.
Crontab to just auto reboot daily is probably better - if your PC becomes unresponsive I doubt it would be able to execute another script on top of everything. Ideally though, you’d do some log diving and figure out the cause.
Funeral potatoes are the one food I miss from Utah. The ultimate comfort food.
I got a NUC on ebay for about the same price, maybe a little less. Has more I/O and an SSD.
Why block Wine? It’s gotta be a tiny fraction of their user base.
That was the best part, it was like no humans were in the building for a bit there.
Rivian hasn’t yet adopted NACS, these are CCS.
Yep, I just got local county fiber installed because Comcast would go down twice a day, at least. On top of that, I was paying out the ass for shitty upload speed and to remove the 1.2TB data cap. The local ISPs are about $60/mo for 1 gig up and down, compared to Comcast’s $130/month for 1 “gig” down and 30 meg up.
Internet should be public like many other utilities.
If they eventually do have a search engine, it definitely can’t be trusted. GPT-4 loves to hallucinate.
You can automate linux updates, and this can be enforced through your organization. So, no, it is not always in the users control, like in the case of having unattended upgrades in linux enabled with enterprise software.
Huh? I restart firefox multiple times a day, I was simply trying to point out that if you have automated updates and automatic clears of browsing data enabled you’ll run into this. I’m not about to start doing so manually just because the browser restarts itself.
It matters more when you clear history and cookies automatically at close. You lose your entire session.
Spoiler: it won’t be $25,000.
Greedy short-sighted execs strike again.
Unemployment isn’t enough, I’m not forgetting that at all.
Yep, that sounds great to me! At least for large corporations. Obviously shouldn’t apply to contractors, but that sounds great.
I mean, I’m not a lawmaker, but ideally if execs do layoffs they should either have to also layoff a certain percentage of upper level execs dependent on the # of people laid off, and/or the company or execs should have to pay fees dependent on the # of people laid off.
We need laws around layoffs, stat. It shouldn’t be legal for execs to layoff a thousand people and still keep their own jobs. It’s their failure that caused the issue in the first place - they’ve been safe for too long.
deleted by creator