M2, pls

deleted by creator

Love mdma, I belive that it could help PTSD, but I agree with you, is no benefit for anyone to rush such a thing.

The whole vive is "they stopted it cause is “drugs”, but like, those are good reasons to stop any trials.

Graphene os + a work profile + sandboxed play services allows you to have some baking apps. Ive got 3 and they all work without a hitch.

Is has been discussed, I read once here: https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/475-wallet-google-pay/2 about it, but sadly the tweet is gone and I dont remeber the exact reason.

Nobody’s stupid enough to

Every sentence that begins this way is wrong.

Nobody is stupid enough to belive that every sentence that begings with “Nobody’s stupid enough” is automatically wrong

Im high

We have a development system for python on Windows at work, works very well also.

On linux is one pip install, buy maybe first do a venv^^

Chaos, not anarchy!

Amazing solution, didn’t arrive to that one, I was thinking just making a timing constraint to reveal the number that would make the precaculation practically imposible, but the commitment schmeme is waaaay more elegant.

Not very important, even if generated by a single actor N has not such a big importance. If I were implementing something like this I’d just probably make it -hardcoded-.

If you reaaaallyyyy want to decide on a N on the fly, I’d put a restricction (a

1. Decide on a random N and what tails (even) and heads (uneven) mean.

2. Each party generates a random number

3. Combine the numbers with a conmutative operation of some sort, the harder the operation the better.

4. Take the hash N times. (Can be done independently by each participant)

(4.5) optional: for extra robustness, do some hard-to-calculate transformations to the result of 4. (Can be done independently by each party)

5. The final result is either uneven or even === coin toss. (0 will be treathed as even*.*)

This is not infalibe, one party could get all the numbers a precalculate a answer to get a specific result but they will need to randomly try numbers. adding some timing constrains, using big numbers and hard operations would make that sort of attack not really practicable.

Nice question, had fun thinking about it!

Either you run the RP in the VPS and point to the ips on your server or you run it on the server and access it like you are accessing Jellyfin.

Easiest option is a container with Nginx proxy manager (imo) with NPM you can get free let’s encrypt certs, but be aware, in case you want automated certificates, NPM will need to run on the machine pointed to by the DNS (in your case, your VPS I guess)

I recently open a intagram account again… Is just easier to keep in touch with old friends there, also tbh easier to have contact with girls. I try no to scroll there tho.

I do have both.

I didnt say anything about the interoperability. I can imagine some wins… but nothing game changing tbh.

Aw man, I missunterstood everything :(

https://faq.whatsapp.com/1317564962315842/?cms_platform=android

This worked for me!

You can. Up to 7.

It might work with people you know but is harder to convince people you just met, that’s the reason I still use Whatsapp and recently opened an Instagram.

Only in the south, acording to my experience

We have something like that here too: MOIA in Hamburg.