100% agreed. That is what I see, you can clearly see the line of the reflection of the rock. It is slightly darker due to Fresnel effect. The imperfection is most likely due to ripples of the water surface. The rest of the image also totally consistent with a picture of a lake or a pond beyond a fence.

This is just silly.

This would be a great fit for a r/NotTheOnion type of sub.

I don’t need to read an article to know that “no” is the correct answer the question in the title.

I totally get all the concerns related to AI. However, the bandwagon of: “look it made a mistake, it’s useless!” is a bit silly.

First of all, AI is constantly improving. Remember everyone laughing at AI’s mangled fingers? Well, that has been fixed some time ago. Now pictures of people are pretty much indistinguishable from real ones.

Second, people also make critical mistakes, plenty at that. The question is not whether AI can be absolutely accurate. The question is whether AI can make on average fewer mistakes than human.

I hate the idea of AI replacing everything and everyone. However, pretending that AI will not be eventually faster, better, cheeper and more accurate that most humans is wishful thinking. I honestly think that our only hope is legislation, not the desperate wish that AI will always need human supervision and input to be correct.

Is it me or are there guts in this picture?

Laughs in Nestle.

Problem: …

Response: Obliterate one of the most established logos and a verb “to tweet”

At least ChatGPT will not flag the question as duplicate.

Precisely, karma whoring was already rampant and detestable.

Yes, it’s so cringe. Honestly, he is like a child. Especially that this is all done publicly.

I am not replacing it.

I have already done it few weeks ago.