You may believe what you want or even reject evolution apparently, but you have now finally arrived at your statement and we can just agree to disagree as I will not forcefully teach people that doesn’t want
You may believe what you want or even reject evolution apparently, but you have now finally arrived at your statement and we can just agree to disagree as I will not forcefully teach people that doesn’t want
When you make games one of the hardest part is figuring out what works best for gamers that don’t like the same things as you, if that makes sense. I feel like a model could help with things adjacent to that
Wow, that’s a great move
I just want an ai model that categorises player types and explains to me what and why makes certain types like some mechanics. It’s not useful in the least to generate visuals
Seems like almost everyone understands that it hallucinates.
Ah. So civilian mercs can be bought by corpos for a raid at a moments notice. Great. What’s the patchnotes for the resistance movement again? Oh yeah. Removed the ability to communicate cryptographically. Our only tool. Thanks devs
If you stop allowing them to do it they can’t, because they’re OLD PEOPLE with severely impeded cognitive ability
Not really, and I think it’s because any unnecessary trait is an extra cost. But you can have your belief or even think we were magiced by an all powerful entity
No, what we call random is when it’s unpredictable. The more unpredictable, the better “quality” of the random. Any generative process, and huge amounts of systems you use every day use random but systems emerge from the chaos. And no. Traits that aren’t beneficial are extremely rare and we think it’s because we are missing why it was useful.
Definitely. It’s maybe also the taint of the megacorps that train them to then put sadistic system prompts into them before training it on the public
All right, I don’t want to dismiss how you feel or anything but so many people said this that they did experiments to see and it turns out that nah, overall, people thought mostly that the robot art was more human, and the effect comes from the knowledge of the painter. All things equal, emotional connections happen just as much (if not more) with generative art. That doesn’t surprise me honestly, it’s mimicking humans. And the rating of how likely it is to do so has guided it to the end product, so somehow, the humanity is embedded. It’s not something that feels great as I am an artist myself, but I accept science on this one.
Who do you think has paid artists throughout history?
(Patrons is the answer)
It’s like medieval times when syphilis was the rage so idiots started pointing their little finger when drinking tea. I can see how most normal people just made mocking songs about them even under threat of beheading
Making a “state structure” that vilifies and exclude humans based on race, sexual orientation, thoughts etc. Is not valid. It’s not a state structure. It’s a tantrum. It’s rage and hate. It’s not a valid state organization because it’s not related to the things those concern, it’s focused on defeating pain from being inferior onto others and doesn’t belong
No, that’s what I am saying. They are saying that it’s a random effect.
Nah they have people helping them. At any second you could stop and they would have no power. But you continually support their project
No that’s absolutely not true, every part of evolution happens for a reason and those we don’t know, we research until we find out why
Corporations are not people. They are machines
You are taking side in that text. I fully understand it, it’s not as elegant and complex as you think. It’s just evil.
Just it might help to know about the experiments, I don’t know how to interpret it except I’m not on board with just calling generated art less human or enjoyable just as an art form itself (in general that is)