Uncle Samuel L Jackson

I’d recommend migrating one service at a time (install, migrate, shake down; next service).

Either prioritize what you want declouded the most, or start with the smallest migration and snowball bigger.

I disagree, but maybe it’s because I have kids of my own now.

Do any of you face similar challenges

Sounds like, I’m in a fairly ideal suburb for everything I need but the distances can be far for things I want

do you just drive when it makes the most sense to drive?

My biggest mental shift was instead of “driving if it makes sense to drive” to “driving if it doesn’t make sense to walk/bike/transit.”

Basically I look at all other methods of transit/destinations first; then drive only if required.

Biggest example: I usually take the bike and trailer to drop my kid off at daycare on the way to work. Weather hasn’t stopped me yet; but if the school busses are canceled, I will drive because there’s a marked increase in more drivers paying less attention on the roads I must take. If I had separated bike facilities I could still bike.

Hello Torontonian. Fuck bills 212 and 197, eh?

Kingstonian.

Nice, Nova Scotia exists after 1979.

So we agree there are candidates, we just need to negotiate on where the line is.

No, flamingos did not come first.

Star wars happened a long long time ago.

The joke here is that Canadian Breaking Vad is the same TV show, except he is trying to pay for parking.

1. Every hospital has along term parking solution you just need to ask about.

2. Take public transit.

Were guys with an unfortunate situation, but no kids or STIs!

IFVs generally carry a full load, making them more fuel efficient per pax than the vast majority of vehicles on the road.

We had a neat thing happen in my city recently.

A bridge was closed for repairs for 4 months. During that time, no one used the road approaching the bridge on either side! That’s a ton of lane that nobody was using, but we decided to not take it out.

Shockingly, once the bridge was replaced, drivers started using those two sections of road again.

As Boulder police commander Darren Fladung told Denver’s 9News, “I appreciate the fact that it’s drawing attention to the fact that we’d like people to slow down and not be on their phones, but there’s probably, again, a few more appropriate ways about getting that message out.”

Then why aren’t you already doing those more appropriate things?

I’m not a fan of straight proportional representation, because it undercuts and devalues ridings and constituencies.

I’m not going to pretend to know the real solution though.

you would fail to pass your test on if you were driving under the limit for no reason.

So you need to break the law to pass your driving test? Carbrainism is wild.

I fully accept your built environment argument, and everything else you are saying. But this? “It’s actually a struggle. climbing it at 20mph, and I even get foot pain trying to keep the accelerator at just the right depression to stay at 20mph.” Means you are physically unfit to drive. It’s also a maximum, you’re allowed to go below 20 mph.

A self-paced study program with testing at the end should be satisficing and economical.

For comparison, here’s the requirements for pilots. I’d say aviation has got it pretty dialed in by now.

https://tc.canada.ca/en/aviation/licensing-pilots-personnel/staying-current-proficient-pilot

The Ontario Highway Traffic Act, for example, gets about 6 updates per year.

Online Written test every year, in person written test every 2 years (the laws do change after all).

Road test every 4-5 years.

Bingo on the violations. In person written test for any infraction, road test for any infraction involving points.