Apparently my way of consuming YT is very different from most people. I do rely on subscriptions feed, but I have never used notifications. The feed still works perfectly - for me at least.
Just out of curiosity. Why do you need notifications? Do you try to watch the videos as soon they are posted?
That’s good. You can also check out btrbk - it’s a tool which can take snapshots for you, like Timeshift, but also back them up to somewhere.
Absolutely, my backup solution is actually based on BTRFS snapshots. I use btrbk (already mentioned in another reply) to take the snapshots and copy them to another drive. Then a nightly restic job backs up the latest snapshot to B2.
Just a friendly reminder that BTRFS snapshots are not backups.
Yeah, I intentionally left out the word “groundbreaking” from the title when posting, because that’s a ridiculous thing to say about this research. Obviously, it could be much better.
But I would say that any attempt at rational look at LLMs in mainstream media is a step in the right direction.
Well, yeah, I could’ve told you that too but neither of us would have any proof. It’s one thing to try it out and decide that it sucks for your use case and another thing to measure and quantify it somehow.
Why such a negative reaction if you apparently agree with the outcome?
I’m not surprised by those results at all but I think it’s a very good thing to see some actual research and numbers.
I use Neovim. It feels like a second nature after using it for years. I love how effortless the interaction with the editor is after you have spent hundreds of hours learning it. I have no reasonable arguments to convince anyone to do that though. I just do it because I enjoy the hell out of it 🤷♂️
I just fought them off in my apartment. Everything they said is correct. I just want to add that I bought some kind of spray to kill them and it was very effective. Got rid of them in two applications.
It’s just reskinned Firefox though.
Which will be years from now, if ever. I mean, I hope for them as much as you do, but it doesn’t mean there is no problem right now.
It’s funny because where I live there were even warnings to never give your card to the cashier back when they weren’t so popular. It was precisely because of some rare cases of cashiers managing to clone or charge the card during that moment. I, and most people I know, wouldn’t just hand in their card if asked. It just doesn’t happen here.
I mean, yeah, that’s the point of compression. I don’t quite get what you mean by that comment.
I really don’t think that’s a lot either. Nowadays we routinely process terabytes of data.
Oh, I know, believe me. I have some painful first-hand experience with such code.
I think portability and easy parsing is the only advantage od CSV. It’s definitely good enough (maybe even the best) for small datasets but if you have a lot of data you need a compressed binary format, something like parquet.
Is 600 MB a lot for pandas? Of course, CSV isn’t really optimal but I would’ve sworn pandas happily works with gigabytes of data.
Thanks for the info. I’m very relieved, I love the bottom bar!
Right?! It’s the same for me!