data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33b20/33b20870f6d0ea7e1bacfd49de3c242fd138982f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1df69/1df69f53f5559e83c288e08b403109544e78dc05" alt=""
2·
4 months agoI’ve been through the same. I was so sad to learn this. This is what personal growth looks like, you learned a thing today. Be proud of yourself
I’ve been through the same. I was so sad to learn this. This is what personal growth looks like, you learned a thing today. Be proud of yourself
I actually thought optical microscopy worked just fine at this scale.
I know it’s not the case for this photo, but if a 7 μm red bloodcell is reflecting red light (700nm, aka 0.7μm) under a bright white light, wouldn’t the smallest discernable detail of the red blood cells be about a 10th of its width? Is that not roughly the detail we have in this image?
I’m making an assumption that the distance between discernable parts roughly parallels the wavelength’s width. I could be wrong tho