• 4 Posts
  • 73 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023

help-circle

  • It’s a start. Just boycotting for a week, while a small drop, serves two purposes. First (assuming it registers), it’s a warning shot to the powers that be saying, “We are asking politely that you pick our side. We will get less polite.” Second, it gets people who would otherwise not resist more comfortable with it. Just as with evil, if one can go from A to B then B to C because C is not much more than B, the same incremental approach can be used for pro-social behaviors, too. In other words, not buying from Amazon for a week makes it easier to talk to friends about resisting, which makes it easier to go to a march, which makes it easier to…so on and so forth.

    That said, I doubt that this will have much of an effect on Amazon or the other powers that be. If it registers, it will be a small blip. With continued action, that blip will grow.




  • A general strike would be amazing, but it’s not realistic. Even just having say 25% of workers out for a few days puts strain on the system. Same with limiting spending. If even 25% of the country spends only on essentials, then that’ll translate to a couple percentage points of loss to major corporations (not all of course, but some major ones).

    It’s not about a silver bullet, it’s about inflicting enough paper cuts that it starts to hurt. No one thing will be 100% effective.





  • It’ll most likely be on a per-unit or sub-unit basis. Hell, not even every platoon will likely act as one…

    If an illegal order comes down (because very many things are immoral but not illegal), there is a duty to not follow the order. That said, I’d imagine that the military will split. By how much is determinant on the method. An immoral/illegal order will probably lead to the split being mostly on the side against the government, e.g. being deployed specifically to shoot civilians. An immoral/legal order will likely end up with most staying with the government. Let’s hope Trump and his lackeys don’t have their lawyers look at things too closely…

    Now, the real trouble comes in with something like simply deploying the active duty or federalized Guard within the country. No technical orders to shoot or do anything objectionable. Simply existing and “guarding” would likely be illegal under the Posse Comitatus act, but presence is not immoral. For this, I really don’t know how it would land.



  • I appreciate the feedback! It’s already 8.5x11, but I didn’t think of what it would look like in greyscale. When I tried, the blue and the red looked almost the same. (Side note, the roundel being only the star and “wings” actually had an interesting look that I may play with more.)

    Here’s an update. I agree that putting the roundel in the center looks better. I also made a version with a blue border and red writing. In greyscale, of course, they look virtually identical.


  • So, I liked your idea, and I threw together something pretty quickly. I was using a stylized omega at the bottom, but it wasn’t really working (to my eye at least). Instead, I threw on the U.S. air roundel from World War II. My thinking is that it’s A. a distinctly American symbol, B. Evocative of fighting fascists, and C. Different from the current roundel (which has a red stripe), but similar enough to be recognizable comfortable.

    I’d love some feedback. I’ve got another couple I’m working on, too, that can be ready to share soon.


  • This is a great point, and I love the idea of picking specific issues! I do think some general “Fascists beware” style fliers would be good, though, at least from perspective of making them feel less secure. But I see what you mean that “fascist” doesn’t really meet the mark and could be misinterpreted. What is a less loaded term? “Trumpists”? “MAGAs”? (MAGAT is too loaded and negative)








  • By all means text each other about it. No way they can find out about that.

    That’s a great point. It’s worth going old school in this case for signalling. Word of mouth, visual signals, auditory signals, etc. that are seemingly arbitrary would be a good, though local, way of giving immediate signs.

    However, it’s not illegal to monitor and publish that online. If you have the ability, it’s pretty easy to set up a website that has information on their movements. If editing privileges are restricted, you can make a good source of information that is the equivalent of a board saying “ICE reported in the area.” That’s just off of my head, though, so please feel free to poke holes and refine.





  • It’s a fundamental misunderstanding of what Section 31 is supposed to be. Sloan wasn’t a good guy. 31 actively tried to commit genocide.

    The idea behind them is that arguments of ends justifying the means and “getting dirty” to preserve higher ideals is morally, philosophically, and practically bankrupt. The Federation didn’t need 31 to win the war, and in fact, their methods would have made it much worse. Section 31 as a plot device exists to show us that there will always be those looking to use higher ideals to support terrible actions, and we must be constantly vigilant against them.

    It truly pains me how that message has been twisted, and people think Section 31 are not only good guys but also cool.