Plutus, Haskell, Nix, Purescript, Swift/Kotlin. laser-focused on FP: formality, purity, and totality; repulsed by pragmatic, unsafe, “move fast and break things” approaches
AC24 1DE5 AE92 3B37 E584 02BA AAF9 795E 393B 4DA0
Anduril is scary. They seem able to harness the most elegant technologies that idiot government redneck contractors tended to avoid in years past. I’ve seen them in Haskell and Nix forums offering jobs to morally bankrupt autists FAR too often. Fuck you, Anduril.
Tell me you’re 15 years old without specifically telling me you’re 15 years old….
Is he going to do this Brett Favre thing where he pretends to retire every year and there’s this whole media circus following him around obsessing over it?
Just go out without a peep, dude. It’s classier…but then again Quentin isn’t really known for class though he’s certainly capable of recognizing it from others.
Thanks for the corrections.
Ahh. Thanks for this insight.
It certainly does.
Until last week, you absolutely NEEDED an NVidia GPU equipped with CUDA to run all AI models.
Today, that is simply not true. (watch the video at the end of this comment)
I watched this video and my initial reaction to this news was validated and then some: this video made me even more bearish on NVDA.
Edit: corrected and redacted.
True. Thats why I tend to make small plays instead of being an absolute degenerate gambler.
The reason for the correction is that the “smart money” that breathlessly invested billions on the assumption that CUDA is absolutely required for a good AI model is suddenly looking very incorrect.
I had been predicting that AMD would make inroads with their OpenCL but this news is even better. Reportedly, DeepSeek doesn’t even necessarily require the use of either OpenCL or CUDA.
Even if they get banned, any startup could replicate their work if it is truly open source. The best thing about their solution is that it breaks the CUDA monopoly that NVDA has enjoyed. Buy your puts when NVDA bounces because that stock is GOING DOWN. There’s no world where a company that makes GPU’s is worth more than both Apple and Microsoft. It’s inevitable.
The Super Bowl is by far the biggest TV event of the year. But for movie studios eager to capitalize on the enormous power of the NFL as a marketing platform for upcoming blockbusters, it’s not the only game in town, and sports-related opportunities to impress hard-to-reach audiences don’t begin and end there.
Inevitably, there’s considerable focus on which movie ads drop during the Super Bowl, which takes place Feb. 9 this year and will be broadcast by Fox. That’s in part because of the lofty price tag associated with advertising during the game, with reports the network is commanding $7 million on average per 30-second spot.
The opportunities to capitalize on the NFL’s unparalleled popularity, however, don’t stop there. And marketers have become increasingly savvy about leveraging excitement around the playoffs, including this weekend’s league-championship games, which also promise to be an enormous attraction.
Disney has aggressively used football to promote the first major blockbuster to roll out this calendar year, the Marvel sequel “Captain America: Brave New World,” during the playoffs. Scheduled to open Feb. 14, the Anthony Mackie-starring film already received extensive advertising during earlier rounds of the playoffs ahead of a synergistic “sneak peek” during this week’s college-football championship game on Disney-owned ESPN, which averaged more than 22 million viewers, a 12% decline from last year.
Although the Super Bowl, which attracted almost 124 million viewers on NBC and its sister networks last year, dominates sports ratings, the NFL playoffs and division championships still deliver vast audiences of their own, including millions of younger men, a key demographic that’s often difficult to reach via linear TV platforms.
Notably, this weekend’s AFC championship games — defending Super Bowl champs Kansas City Chiefs vs. the Buffalo Bills on CBS and the Philadelphia Eagles vs. the Washington Commanders on Fox, both airing Sunday — will likely deliver lots of eyeballs to whatever ads studios run. Last year’s conference championship games, Kansas City vs. Baltimore on CBS and Detroit vs. San Francisco on Fox, averaged 55.5 million and 56.3 million viewers, respectively.
Ads in those games reportedly cost about $3 million each — a relative bargain compared to the Super Bowl. Although that game carries plenty of intangible benefits, including the media hoopla that surrounds the Super Bowl ads and the game’s ability to reach viewers as interested in the ads as the on-field action.
While there will be other major sporting events between now and summer, including March Madness (the NCAA basketball tournament) and NBA playoffs from April into June, nothing in sports rivals the NFL in terms of size or scale — especially in an increasingly fragmented TV environment.
Film marketers nevertheless face tough decisions on how best to allocate their budgets, since the Super Bowl offers the ability to gin up excitement about movies — often months in advance — but no assurances of success.
Last year’s lineup of Super Bowl movie ads included the eventual hits “Deadpool & Wolverine” (which bypassed in-game rates, airing a teaser spot during the pregame festivities), “Wicked” and “Twisters,” but also “The Fall Guy” and “IF,” which delivered disappointing box office returns when they opened in May.
Studios generally play their cards close to the vest on Super Bowl marketing plans until the last minute, and this year remains no exception.
Disney will be back to promote unspecified properties in Super Bowl LIX, a studio insider confirmed to TheWrap. Opening the same week as the game, “Captain America: Brave New World” is the most immediate concern — the studio is leveraging Harrison Ford turning into Red Hulk in marketing the first “Captain America” movie without Chris Evans. But other major releases due this year include another Marvel title, “Thunderbolts*,” as well as the live-action “Lilo & Stitch” in May. All are possibilities for Super Bowl spots.
But those marketing decisions aren’t strictly limited to movies, with TV and streamers recognizing the inherent power of the Super Bowl for projects with the heft to merit such exposure. Amazon, for example, used the 2022 Super Bowl to tease its “The Lord of the Rings” series, while Disney’s spots last year included FX/Hulu’s period epic“Shōgun,” which went on to dominate the Emmys and Golden Globes.
Documentary filmmaker Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy is due to make her narrative feature debut with the project
Mark my words: they GUARANTEE that it will be bad by hiring a first time director that has previously only worked in documentaries for a movie with a budget this big. How can they STILL keep making these unforced errors with billion dollar franchises?
They could have shot it on a potato and most people wouldn’t have noticed.
I’m probably not most people since I do this professionally.
I used to be a projectionist.
The projector was fine.
And looks objectively terrible compared to basically ANY major motion picture released this year (perhaps just short of the great film but terribly-lit “Rob Peace”).
I was flabbergasted that such horrifically flat lighting and incredibly dismal/uninspired camera work didn’t trigger any reshoots (particularly with the $150 million budget they had and, as a consequence, the equipment they had at their disposal.)
Unless your lights are hard-wired or connecting to a locked down guest WiFi network, you are exposing your WiFi credentials to potential attackers.
The microcontrollers that control Christmas lights are riddled with backdoors and holes.
That’s probably the real reason that this piece of shit NSA spook wants everyone to have smart Christmas lights.
“Trust me bro” style hand-rolled encryption.
A great place to go to discourage them from the inescapable financial trap that is higher education in the US.
There’s like three studios left. Welcome to oligopoly.
Hot take: Might be wise to adopt the security by obscurity model and go with an OS that is hardened (ideally, a formally verified microkernel like sel4) or runs in a custom VM/container with almost zero attack surface area.