thanks for the explanation. i guess it really doesn’t work as a meme if I’ve doesn’t happen to know this particular image.
thanks for the explanation. i guess it really doesn’t work as a meme if I’ve doesn’t happen to know this particular image.
I’m having the same problem. this kind of nested argument is quite annoying to program in e.g. argp. i am even thinking of using a minimal forth like parser to do this.
if it remember it correctly it was said in relation to algorithm optimization > code optimization
love a hot fuzz reference https://youtu.be/mcFN-I7_IjA?t=168&feature=shared
thanks! but i can’t access the site (certificate expired some certificate related error, then, page not found). I’ll try again later
i feel like half the article is missing
does anyone know whether these results were obtained while taking the size of the dictionary into account?
well for companies it makes sense i guess. after all they could spend their money on other social media thingies if their research shows that mastodon isn’t working for them.
but what really bothers me is that this article shows that companies become interested in mastodon. i really would love to have a place just for people to interact not companies and their stupid social media teams. on their hand there’s a good chance that I’ll never even notice their posts anyways.
uhh this is dark. I’ll have to follow up on this. brr
no it’s not. but you should know what you’re getting into.
in the beginning of my PhD i really loved what i was doing. from an intellectually point of view i still do. but later, i.e. after 3 years doing a shitty postdoc, i realized that I was not cut out for academia but nevertheless loved doing science.
however, i was lucky to find a place in industry doing what i like.
so i guess my 2c is: think about what comes after the PhD and work towards that goal. a PhD is usually not a goal in itself. hth