Hence, if the data is not on someone else’s computer in the first place, it is not a matter of time.

The solution is to stop putting your data on other people’s computers. You can’t control other people’s computers. Apple does not care about you any more than any other trillion dollar corpo. Take back control.

May be IS

Fixed that for ya

Oh please. Warrants are rubber stamped, it’s as simple as clicking a button. And do you really think entities like the NSA bother with formalities like warrants?

as Chinese law allows government access to company-held data.

… Kind of exactly like how US law allows government access to company-held data?

But-but I was told Apple’s security was the very best! That’s why they charge so much for everything they make, right? … Right?

You have a very interesting way of ascribing motive here. You say I lack imagination, I say you have an excess of imagination.

So you’re gonna skip over the part where I was right and you were plainly wrong?

If I were to suggest an actually productive solution with a $10k budget, my comment would be removed and I’d be on a list. We both know what that means.

Please show me where OP asked for ways to “immediately reduce their carbon footprint.”

That is not what was requested in the post title. “Carbon Footprint” is a piece of propaganda perpetuated by the biggest industry offenders to shift blame to the individual and distract from their own massively disproportionate contribution to climate change.

Yeah that should offset the massive pollution from global industry right? I feel that the shift of responsibility to the individual is a distraction.

Do you believe that the affiliate scam only started when PayPal acquired Honey?

Gonna quit weed. Cold turkey. If I don’t have control over my consumption now, I think that’s a sign I need to stop until I do have that ability again, if ever.

Are the Feds actually this smooth-brained? I mean, I know they have to maintain the appearance of control, so his words make sense from that perspective. But surely they have to be aware, the very backdoors they originally forced down our throats are EXACTLY WHAT’S CAUSING THIS PROBLEM NOW. These geniuses who purportedly protect American citizens, are either woefully inept, lacking basic understanding of how data security actually works, or LYING with malice. Which do you think it is?

Content filters! I’ve got them for Trump, Elon, “Slammed”, “Dragged”, “Blasted” and the question mark, because news headlines in the form of questions can almost always be answered with the word “no” and are not worth my time.

Paid version does both access the web and cite its sources

1. Hasan streams

2. Somebody thinks yeah medicare for all
3. ???
4. ???
5. ???
6. politically viable leftism in the US

It’s the same argument:

1. Everyone has a brat summer
2. Oprah fumbles Kamala thru a question
3. Beyonce performs
4. ???
5. ???
6. ???
7. Democrats win.

Actually laughed out loud at this, well done. You’re an excellent writer. This encapsulates the 24 election so perfectly 😭

I’m basically forced to, daily, thanks for your suggestion tho

His uncle is the owner and founder of TYT Media, and he got his start in media at… TYT. He comes from an immensely wealthy and politically connected family. He has chosen to live in Hollywood, an epicenter of capitalism at its worst.

And thanks for your edit, I think I agree that my perception of him is charged by emotion, but in addition to fact.

Thank you for a nuanced reply. When you put it this way, I can see why many listeners find value in his content. I worked another shift today with him constantly droning in the background and I think my opinion is largely being colored by his presentation style, and my own distaste for “streamers” and “react culture” in general, with his aforementioned privilege issues now coming in third.

His comments about people working “real” jobs having an easier time of it than he does certainly rubbed me the wrong way, though, and his response when called out on it was more of the exact same “BROOO WHAT ARE YOU STUPID? THATS NOT WHAT I MEANT! OK!?” that his streams are full of.

“One of” the only ones, not “the” only one. The difference is exactly what I stated, the respondant clearly understood my question. Would you like me to edit each of my other replies, to acknowledge the ones who also understood my question, for consistency’s sake? I should probably then reply to each of the ones who didn’t understand my question, to make sure and point it out, right? Otherwise I’m being very dismissive?

I’ve been learning from this discussion, so I’m not sure why you think I’m incapable of seeing my biases.

Here’s a question: Is it cool to hoard wealth if you’re saying leftist-sounding stuff while you do it?