data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33b20/33b20870f6d0ea7e1bacfd49de3c242fd138982f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1df69/1df69f53f5559e83c288e08b403109544e78dc05" alt=""
While Reagan is the instrument that set America the path to hell, Bill Clinton was the right hand who crushed any idea of a rebound by labor. One can only assume both Clintons were critical in selling the DNC to capital.
While Reagan is the instrument that set America the path to hell, Bill Clinton was the right hand who crushed any idea of a rebound by labor. One can only assume both Clintons were critical in selling the DNC to capital.
Yes it does, i think there is a tos episode that hints at that as well
How recently did you try this?
What are you using that makes it crash, virtually never happens to me.
That’s a pretty good analogy, but it’s Fortran and B-52. Fortran is very good at what it does to this day. Cobol was never good.
I see Special Agent Bill Patterson, bc [Grotesque]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grotesque_(The_X-Files)?wprov=sfla1) is a fantastic episode.
This is amazing; I’m dying over here.
Cars that have never had a style update. Now that they exist in meaningful numbers they look old and tired.
If getting people back into work makes your property more valuable that the productive losses, it’s not a sunk cost. The leaders might be doing their math wrong, but they are not necessarily making a sunk cost fallacy here.
However, i do agree it’s likely a choice driven by power and personalities, not money. I suspect a lot of talk about how remote workers can be abused and controlled has happened.
They don’t have leases. They own that real estate. So its value is a considerable line item in the company’s value. If they get people in office, it’s a boost to the company’s value. The property is hit yet sunk in their eyes.
No, it does not. It means that they think it’s more profitable for shareholders.
Internet should be a public utility and owned by the local government.
The core issue here is we don’t know how to measure the skill of learning directly.
Bc companies aren’t people. Corporations and humans are in no way two equal entities. There is no reason to think the laws should be set in any way other than ensuring people have their needs met.
Big yes to the scam that is liberal democracy. One terrible use of libs calling things democracy when they aren’t is blanketly condemning everyone in some place bc someone got elected: Russia and every red state in the USA. These places are full of people who do not support the government and had no real chance of electing real representation nor would those elected officals really be useful.
If the wisdoms are wrong or sub optimal, but the followers treat them as dogmatic then its an issue.
Industrial applications, but you dont need good ones for that.
Its been heavily traded and guardrailed to not make judgements.