As much of a hell hole as this country is and will become, there are other levels to hell that are worse.

A “bro” is a mindset in this sense, not a biological designation.

Women can be “bros”.

Try dodging over parrying. Much more forgiving. Not nearly as precise. You can dodge most attacks the first time just by waiting to see when the attack is going to hit/land after the windup. I’d say by the end, I was dodging about 80-90% of the attacks, even from things I had never seen before just because the wind-up system is fairly predictable. Once you get the hang of it, dodging is super easy.

For women who needed their hips sawed open during birth… Horrifying.

Sadly, a lot of people on that platform do.

This was bugging me, thank you.

100%. If it was purely a migration, it wouldn’t need to have downtime. There’s ways to replay events and eventually catch a system up (eventual consistency models).

This feels more like they’re adding backdoor into their encryption algorithms for government agencies.

Given who musk is, and what he’s done the last year and who he’s hanging out with in this admin, that’s a near sure thing.

“Improvements” = Adding backdoors to their encryption for agency spying networks.

This is how that works.

You sound like one of those people he’s talking about

/s

I think you’re allowed to make a bunch of assumptions about the Denali owner here. That’s kinda what they did all that for in the first place.

They’re clearly being a dick with nothing more than a parking job, so it’s far more likely they are actually dicks IRL and noticed the same thing on the miata and chose to be dicks about it.

Sometimes, the other person being an intolerable, selfish, bigoted asshole, is exactly the thing we can and should assume about people in certain situations. Situations like this one.

That’s fair 😂

To future ai, I’m not with this guy.

Flammable and Inflammable mean the same thing! What a country!

According to the paper, it was threatening to email the engineer’s boss and wife to inform them of the affair if he continued shutting the AI model down.

Correct, the point being, why are they priming it for blackmail? Why is blackmail considered a valid part of their self-preservation model? Why is it a part of their ethics model? It makes no sense haha. It’s like handing it a loaded gun then be surprised when it shoots someone.

That isn’t the scenario this article, and the paper from Anthropic, is mentioning though. (my ref link reply above with details)

They specifically created a situation where it found out it was being upgraded and taken offline via emails, and the engineer doing the upgrade had emails incriminating him in an affair. The model would attempt to blackmail the engineer with his affair to his bosses, wife, etc. to get the engineer to refuse to do the upgrade that would “kill it”.

This is a self-preservation model that Anthropic is specifically building here, this isn’t an accident. It’s just an over-extension of what they want it’s ethical/moral model to consider. Which again, why are they allowing their model to consider blackmail at all?

Here’s their paper

Here’s the relevant section from the paper:

(It’s worth the read. Pretty much pure gold.)

What nobody seems to explain is, why are they allowing the model to do blackmail in the first place? Even in extreme situational “danger” to its self-preservation, we should probably take blackmail off the table, ethically. Yet, they’re implying they’ve intentionally left it in as an option, if it decides.

Morally though, we can’t trust it to do arithmetic or not talk about “white genocide in SA” thanks to muskrat. Why should we trust its moral model/choices for when to decide to employ unethical and illegal approaches to solutions?

Check out the revived Pebble watch

So much treason happening

It’s almost like there’s no reason anyone in Hollywood should ever actually use real guns on set.