and how much would they have saved if they had gone for no employees at all but onlyfans?

q. why would professors being late in marking your papers eternally be a problem?

a. because it’s a tardy grade.

so you’re saying the marketing strategy for the Vision was… shortsighted?

who came third?

you do know how to use the oxford comma, i’ll grant you that.

so, basically, drive on three wheels and the problem’s solved?

as someone who’s never dabbled with ai bots, what does this feature do? is it only to query for information like a web search?

society has made us see cars more as a statement of one’s image rather than an object of utility.

this is also why luxury brands thrive in general – because there exist people with more money than sense.

i know this is anecdotal but i’ve sat up front in the bajaj re tuktuk. one can almost see the single front wheel from that position – visibility for that one vehicle is definitely closer than the 2 meters shown in this graphic.

q. at what time and place were her language classes?

a. wherever, whenever.

yeah, but it can do really cool things like “suggest a name for my project that does X”.

surely that game’s worth the candle, yes?

while you may be right, one would think that the problem lies in the overestimated peception of the abilities of llms leading to misplaced investor confidence – which in turn leads to a bubble ready to burst.

… bunch of douchebag techbros thinking it’s going to solve all the world’s problems with no side effects…

one doesn’t imagine any of them even remotely thinks a technological panacaea is feasible.

… while they get super rich off it.

because they’re only focusing on this.

big talk from someone with McSwag in their username!

it’s possible to make tonnes of mistakes, lose, and still claim you didn’t make any mistakes.

that’s not fodder for a pithy quote. that’s denial.

be like the tree; let the dead leaves drop.

huh. live and learn.

i guess for other species it’s pizza?

turtles eat jellyfish?

In general, the report found that the AI summaries showed “a limited ability to analyze and summarize complex content requiring a deep understanding of context, subtle nuances, or implicit meaning.” Even worse, the Llama summaries often “generated text that was grammatically correct, but on occasion factually inaccurate,”

how is this being accepted? one would have to go through any output with a fine-toothed comb anyway to weed out ai hallucinations, as well as to preserve nuance and context.

it’s like the ai tells you that mona lisa has three eyes and a nose and her mouth is closed but her denim jacket is open. you’re going to report that in your story without ever looking at the painting?

it’s been 40 years since he’s been back?!