

That’s all you’re doing.
That’s all you’re doing.
It’s a stereotype to ascribe traits to an entire group of people when you say “America” or “Americans” in The context given. Otherwise one would say , the United States government.
Of course , that requires effort.
And racist vigits have started downvoting
I don’t do that because it wouldn’t be right. Doesn’t matter who did what to me in the past.
For instance if you were a plumber and you intentionally smashed a piece of furniture while at a clients house, does that mean all plumbers are violently vandalizing people’s homes ,no.
Because adult human beings know that the actions of one do not define the actions of all.
I am not changing this position. You can get the last word, throw an insult at me or do nothing.
Choice is yours but I’m done. I don’t have to defend the correct position. It is correct.
You can hire a couple for that money.
As a u s citizen, you’re wrong. End of story most don’t want it. Trump wants it. No one voted for trump because of a I. So stop lying to people here.
Oh and since you’re so gungho to do it, why aren’t you taking the steps above?
Because it seems awful like you’re a Trumper trying to stir violence
Thank you anyone who profiles entire people with stereotypes and outright lies is a bigot, no matter what they say
This is a nightmare. Some mentally deficient vigilante with delusions of grandeur and a fist full of painkillers would use this as a hit list.
.
Ok everyone. Since a.i is trained on what we put out, you know what to do …
Fuck this traitor. Trump is in the Epstein files
The Economic Espionage Act (EEA) of 1996 makes it a federal crime to steal trade secrets, with penalties including up to 10 years in prison and substantial fines
I was thinking more this:
The Economic Espionage Act (EEA) of 1996 makes it a federal crime to steal trade secrets, with penalties including up to 10 years in prison and substantial fines
Intent. One was an accident, the other is potentially criminal if I’m not wrong. I could be.
So. If I can add something here for everyone’s benefit
No search engine really obeys robots.txt
Their publicly acknowledged crawlers do, but they have other crawlers that aren’t know that ignore the file.
Google knows every inch of your site, allowed or not.
See, just because a search engine says it doesn’t know, doesn’t mean it hasn’t crawled. Just doesn’t display the results based on your settings.
Nope. Fuck this company. Do not give in to this. This isn’t about tech. It’s about control. Do not give it up
No you rude fuck.
If i ask a simple question about a subject, let’s say foraging as a I do that a lot. And it’s wrong, it’s friggin wrong.
I’ll ask about a specific plant. Full disclosure this is one of my things. 40 years at it. Ok? No big stretch to think I know a thing or two.
So I ask about let’s say, Japanese barberry. An invasive plant that is hated by many and rightly so at times. The question is , is it edible?
The answer given was no. The truth is the opposite. It is edible. Hell there’s recipes online for barberry jam. Now don’t go just eating them though. Smart to test one or two leaves to see if an individual is allergic. That’s not part of the answer, that’s foraging 101. But I digress. The a.i was wrong and then argued about it until I pulled up all of the evidence. The a.i then admitted it was wrong, but who cares? It’s not alive. Winning an argument with a.i is like beating oneself at poker.
Another example I’ll ask about intervals in music ( guitar teacher as my main profession now, as my passion for 48 years). It got the major scale intervals wrong.
I asked ask if yogurt can replace eggs as a binding agent to one of them (can’t remember which, apologies ) and it said no. That’s a friggin home ec tip that’s been around for at least a century
People who give dissertations don’t brag about it. Especially to make a point in a thread. It only makes one seem like a person who isn’t confident in what they’re saying so they drop a line that they feel will impress others. It doesn’t
Others experience is as important, vital and real as yours, regarding the answers given by a.i , but you’ll brush it off because you feel that some how you have more insight than others. You dont. You just have more time to pour through a.i’s mistakes to massage it to getting something close to what you want. That shows an abundance of time available. Which means you aren’t doing the things I’m talking about.
Or it means this is something you do for your job and it works for those specific needs . Which is fine, but your needs are not the world’s. My need have been poorly met by that tool you spouse. Much like a rake won’t help a guy digging a hole, a.i is the wrong tool for most jobs.
Which means your opinion of my evaluation of a. I results is skewed because you don’t value others experience, no matter how intelligent you are. And that is a sign of ignorance.
I wish you a good day
That’s not research. That’s simply surfacing tidbits it found on the net the happen to be true
.I’ve asked many questions of many llms in my chosen areas of interest and modest expertise , seeking more than basic knowledge( which it often surprisingly lacks ) it always has at least one error. Often so subtle it goes on noticed until it’s too late.
Llms are useful for inspiration, light research, etc.
They should never be used as part of a finished product or as the main scaffolding.
How bout they stop using a. I told lay off people who actually can do the jobs?
No, I’m telling you that you’re being a ridiculous troll berating people just so you can feel better about your lousy situation