• 12 Posts
  • 45 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: November 19th, 2023

help-circle



  • zabadoh@ani.socialtoxkcd@lemmy.worldxkcd #3045: AlphaMove
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    The writer played multiple games of chess against some conventional chess programs or AIs, and used a simple algorithm to determine their own moves:

    For each move, the writer:

    1. Generated a list of all possible moves in the current position, and the moves were recorded in standard algebraic chess notation
    2. Sorted the list of possible moves in alphabetic order
    3. Used the move that was in the center of the sort order, but I have no idea what they did if the number of possible moves was even

    This algorithm for choosing chess moves did not result in optimal play, and lost badly against the standard chess programs/AIs.

    The illustrated position shows the algorithm generating a blunder or useless move for White (Ne2) that allows a checkmate victory for Black with their next move (… b4#), i.e. “Black Bishop moves to b4, checkmate.”

    Black’s winning move is not shown, likely as a brainteaser for the readers.

    The writer named their algorithm “AlphaMove” as a take on Google’s famous chess playing AI from 2017 named “AlphaZero”.

    Except in the writer’s case, the “Alpha” in their algorithm’s name is short for “alphabetic”, which makes the expanded name “Alphabetic(-sort)Move”.


  • The most recent James Bond movie No Time To Die (2021).

    The plot was like a Bond fanfic. Okay, great you got to do all the stuff to Bond that wouldn’t fly in previous runs:

    spoiler

    Bond finally spawns a kid after all that sex, actually loves some gal instead of using her, makes a mistake in judgement, and he maybe even dies, although no body is offered as proof.

    Now what? That pretty much ends the franchise, because they’ve written themselves into a corner, and there’s pretty much nowhere to go without a reboot.














  • Also trying out Bluesky, and it is a lot like Twitter used to be, but it has the potential to turn out like Xitter is today, because at the end of the day Bluesky is a for-profit startup corporation.

    Sooner or later, Bluesky is going to want to make money for its shareholders, and that means any of: 1) Selling advertisements, 2) Selling your personal data, and/or 3) In a classic tech startup play, selling itself to the highest bidder like: Android, YouTube, and yes, Twitter.

    And with commercialization, or in Xitter’s case a fool with too much money, comes enshittification.

    Lemmy is nothing like a for-profit startup company, as far as I know, but that doesn’t make it enshittification-proof, but at least it won’t take the commercialization route.