• Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    It is relevant to history. You can either tell the Trump story that a bullet hit his ear, or you can say that he caught shrapnel.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The only way that would be relevant would be if there was a determination that the shooter was trying to do some kind of ad hoc false flag thing, as opposed to writing his own name into history. Everything we know at this point indicates that the latter is true, and the former is not.

      Whether Trump’s injury was the result of a fired projectile or a piece of shrapnel, the injury was caused by an assassination attempt.