• Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because the system is set up to prevent any real change for the benefit of the common people. So your choice is between the friendly, somewhat reasonable oligarchy stooge and the utterly deranged oligarchy stooge.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      A somewhat less pessimistic take: the system is set up to be self-stable.

      And it was also designed so that States would have most of the power, not the Federal government.

      At various points in history the common people did get benefits. New Deal. Universal suffrage. Civil rights. Abolition.

      But it always requires a critical mass of the population to support change.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And it was also designed so that States would have most of the power, not the Federal government.

        Yeah, but then we changed it because of the civil war…

        The system was designed for the president to be a mostly performative figurehead. Then we gave the president real power, but left determination like the president didn’t matter.