PugJesus@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 hours agoThe issue is not space, but how we move through itlemmy.worldimagemessage-square72fedilinkarrow-up11.01Karrow-down122
arrow-up1988arrow-down1imageThe issue is not space, but how we move through itlemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 hours agomessage-square72fedilink
minus-squareSergio@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·17 hours ago probably not going to save 95% of the trees I was wondering that too… maybe they meant: plant new trees, and the total number of new trees would be 95% of the number of old trees?
minus-squareLibertyLizard@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·16 hours agoI’m guessing they’re just not aware of construction impacts on trees. It’s not something most people think about.
minus-squarePugJesus@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·16 hours agoI supposed they meant “And this amount of space is still available for greenery” rather than “These, specific, trees will be preserved”
I was wondering that too… maybe they meant: plant new trees, and the total number of new trees would be 95% of the number of old trees?
I’m guessing they’re just not aware of construction impacts on trees. It’s not something most people think about.
I supposed they meant “And this amount of space is still available for greenery” rather than “These, specific, trees will be preserved”