• Redfugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Such a disingenuous title. He never said voters were ready for a gay VP, his quotes were in response to a question if he thought voters were ready for a black woman. But I guess nobody reads the article and just throws in their 2 cents on what they think of Pete as a VP.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      his quotes were in response to a question if he thought voters were ready for a black woman

      This somehow makes the article even worse.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’d caution against Pete specifically. Given the meme-state of modern politics and sheer stupidity of the average voter, it’d be a terrible idea to run a gay man whose name looks like ‘buttplug’.

    …and I’m not making a joke right now - collectively we’re 100% dumb enough to throw an election over that.

    • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Lest we forget this exists

      I know posting ben garrison is cheating, but this was years ago. They’d definitely latch on to the name as a tool to degrade him.

      Hell, they’ve been trying to make the word “kamala” derogatory. Sorry Pete, even though you’d be as good a candidate as any, you’ve got butt in your name

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I actually think he would make a better POTUS candidate balanced by a Mark Kelly or something in the future. I think as a VP candidate, his value-add isn’t substantive enough to outweigh the bigotry against a gay-brown-black-woman ticket. (Sadly.)

      I do think Buttigieg is an excellent communicator and is very competent at going toe-to-toe against any mouth-froth republican, which is a real asset. Despite being a prosecuter, Kamala isn’t as good at it. It’s not a court room, no one is is under oath in political combat sports, and she too often thinks being right and factual will prevail. Pete is right and factual but also knows how to knife fight despite seeming milquetoast.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Pete doesn’t actually get things done, and he’s a PMC McKinsey dud… Nothing wrong with who he loves, he’s just a real bummer as a politician.

    Also there’s a reason the VP shortlist are milquetoast white males… Grandma in Ohio might be able to vote for a woman of color, but these frightened bigots need a “safe” feeling backup plan in VP. Win the battle, take the win if Kamala can break that barrier. She wouldn’t be my first choice generally, but she has the momentum and now seems like the time. I’m supporting her full speed

    • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      What I love about him though is how he talks to Republicans. He just has a way of making their hypocrisy obvious to them and you can literally see their brain short circuit and do a hard reboot before they respond. He’s given some great interviews on fox news. But besides that I could take him or leave him.

    • Tom_Hanx_Hail_Satan@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      1000% agree. I’m not stoked about, most likely, not voting in a dem primary for 8 years. Harris wouldn’t be my first choice but I don’t wanna deflate the hype train at all. Hoping for a super majority in congress, that would be the big win. Really hope true progressives can accomplish as much as possible with that. Last time it happened for dems we got the ACA, that should be the minimum benchmark.

      HARRIS/ANONYMOUS GENERIC WHITE GUY 2024!

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Word.

        Harris/Guy that gramma would be happy to see advertised on a real estate bench 2024

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Pete doesn’t actually get things done

      He gets things done for his constituency, which is the network of business lobbyists that power his presidential ambitions. He’s an excellent resource for BNSF and Union Pacific. He’s a valuable asset for Boeing and FedEx. He’s just no good if you’re riding Amtrack or stuck in an airport at 2am waiting for JetBlue to get its shit together.

  • pastabatman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’ve read this article twice and nowhere does he say the words “America is ready for a gay vice president.” He says being gay has not been the detriment to his political career people assumed it would be. He’s not going around telling reporters he thinks he should be VP. In the one quote that he is asked directly whether he would do it, he dodged the question.

  • caboose2006@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    I actually really like buttigieg, but he’s wrong. A woman of color AND a gay man? I wish we lived in that country but we don’t live in that country.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yep, maybe after boomers and gen x have died off sure, but this country is still battling itself on lgbtq rights.

      • carbonari_sandwich@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think this is a common misconception about how electability works in a first-past-the-post voting system. There is no benefit to going with a compromise position or reaching out to moderates. The number of people who can be persuaded to vote one way or another is miniscule. The number of people who can be persuaded to vote or not to vote is massive.

        If people are excited or scared, they come out to vote. With disenfranchisement primarily focused on progressive and minority voters, there’s not much left to gain in scaring regressive conservatives more, they already vote at high numbers.

        • caboose2006@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          While the last part about voting (being persuaded to vote or not vote) is true I think you overestimate the ven diagram of people who are both homophobic and racist. There are plenty who are one and not the other.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    Who the fuck cares if they’re black white gay straight trans, just so the fucking job well. That’s all anyone wants.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        I have. And I’m telling them to get over it and not care. Even though I know they’re too mentally unstable to accept the feedback.

        • GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          The unfortunate reality is that there’s plenty of older democrats, “moderate democrats”, and independents that also have a negative perception of the LGBT community.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            And of course we listen to them, but order everyone on the left to STFU and adore the genocide.

            No more. Let the pampered centrists vote blue no matter who. Let them practice what they preach for the very first time ever. They don’t get their very first choice? FUCKING GOOD. I hope they never do again. Their first choice in 2016 handed the presidency to Trump out of sheer stupid pigheaded hubris. Their judgement is garbage.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Their bigotry or mental health doesn’t make their votes worth less. You can cry about their sensibilities all you want but you need those votes to win regardless. Welcome to democracy.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Which is why the do-nothing Secretary of Transportation and McKinsey grad who got the job to repay a favor is the wrong choice.

      If anything, it could be awful for LGBTQ+ people if the first representation in the White House is a corporatist small town mayor who keeps failing upwards.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’d be fine with a gay VP. We shouldn’t be choosing our candidates based on what bigots want.

      Though I’m not sure Pete is it. He has documented animosity from Black voters because of his time as mayor of South Bend during a period of disparate enforcement of cannabis prohibition. Since Harris is trying to distance herself from her time enforcing cannabis prohibition when she was DA, I think appointing Buttigieg runs the risk of reinforcing the “she’s a cop” narrative and increasing the likelihood that it will become an effective attack against her.

    • xenoclast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I mean this sincerely. Who the fuck cares if he’s gay…but… he’s doing an amazing job where he is. He’s going after shitty airlines and shitty corporations that are screwing people over. Give him 4 more years dunking on delta please !

      • xenoclast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Btw, I’ve noticed nearly every positive dem post on Lemmy today has the top comment being a bot generated negative comment… it’s so obvious it’s standing out.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Sure dude, but no offense, I’m hoping for the war veteran, swing state astronaut. Strategically he looks like the best choice IMO.

    • Mad__vegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I liked him too until I found out it would prompt a special election that Democrats could likely lose

        • taiyang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          He’s a sitting senator of a red leaning state who won because of who he is. He has to vacate to run for VP, which is bad for keeping that seat. Losing the senate easily hamstrings any efforts a President Harris would bring, especially with GOP being the way they are.

          Granted, that can be a problem for all swing state guys. Just isn’t as terrible for governors (although that can screw with other things, like voting rights in a given state).

          • spamfajitas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Senator Kelly’s replacement would be required by Arizona law to be a Democrat appointed by the Governor (also currently a Democrat). The special election to replace the replacement wouldn’t be until 2026. If he’s the right one for the job, it might be worth potentially taking a hit 2 years into a Harris administration.

            • taiyang@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              That’s a good point. I didn’t know it wasn’t until 2026. The main point is to sure up Arizona, which is understandable. The guy from Pennsylvania might be good for that reason, too, but that’s a little less iffy as it’s a little more blue, especially since it sounds like Philly is loving the Harris hype.

    • Kingofthezyx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      He’s pretty moderate though. I’m not sure he’s really the best choice nationally - Harris won’t need help bringing the middle over, she needs to convince progressives to vote.

      • morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        No, actual progressives will vote against fascism, no question. Don’t let the trolls fool you. It’s the people in red areas with only modest critical thinking skills that need to be won over. Hammer home the fact that Kelly isn’t an absolute nutter. Paint that as the big difference between him and the republican ticket. And have the fact that he was in the military proudly displayed, and the fact that he was an astronaut can bring up the rear of their message.

        People who love astronauts are already into science. It’s the classic conservatives/moderates that need to be won over.

        • Etterra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          The progressives need motivation more than anything, and now they have it with Harris. It’s the wishy-washy groups - centrists, right of center, and undecided (how can you be undecided right now wtf?!) - that need coaxing.

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Pete will make it a hard choice. Sorry Pete but unless Mark fucks up big time, I’m an astronaut for VP guy right now…so say nothing Mark! For the love of this nation say nothing. I’ve said nothing for months my self. It can be done.

  • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Honestly, I’d settle for a good one. Gay or not. Because a person’s sexuality and preferences are entirely irrelevant to one’s ability to be a fair and hard working representative.

    • lmaydev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Let’s not pretend that people would refuse to vote for a gay candidate.

      Whether we personally consider it an issue it has likely massively hurt their prospects as a politician.

      Also representation is really important. Especially for younger people.

      • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’ve never in my life voted for someone because they were a heterosexual. I vote based on their track record. When we stop giving a shit about what people do with their genitals, we will be better off. We don’t need gender identity representation in our politics- we just need someone that will treat all people as equals- and enact policy that reflects this.

        • lmaydev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Again you might not but plenty of people would. I would say it’s a pretty large crowd as well.

          Also sexuality has nothing to do with gender.

        • shades@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          When we stop giving a shit about what people do with their genitals,

          This is not how international politics work. Can you think for a second of the optics on the world stage? The us isn’t some international flyover state equivalent like Iceland. If Harris steps down and Buttigeg needs to meet with someone in the Middle East how do you think that meeting is going to go over? The US is a big fish and this is like, unprecedented for a world power this huge.

            • JayTreeman@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Exactly. It would be an incredible way to push forward lgbt+ rights. I’d prefer a candidate with good politics, but I’d be lying if I didn’t like the idea of how it would ruffle bigots… But Harris’s main goal is to get elected.

            • shades@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Ok, fine I’ll give you that totally unlikely outcome. Pete then follows up with the question: Your nation executes homosexuals but decided to let me live, are you going to reconsider your policy on executing them?

              How do you think that response will blow over? This is an unstable region with extreme hatred towards anything lgtbq. Very unlikely they’d even invite him to discuss any oil deals.

              • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Ooh! Is it Fantastic Fiction Story Time?! Ok, my turn!

                Then, President Buttigieg produces flowers from thin air with a “Tah-Dah!”, handing them to the foreign leader. The leader then embraces the president and everyone cheers!

                Fiction is fun!

      • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        it has likely massively hurt their prospects as a politician

        Or, the complete opposite.

        Do you think there’s any way Pete, the mayor of a town of 100,000 people, would have become a national presidential candidate if he wasn’t gay?

        • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Absolutely. Hes one of the best communicators in the party. Dude is a fantastic surrogate. Especially when you send him into unfriendly territory. I’m not going to say he’s the right pick for VP (I have some problems with his policy background), but acting like he’s only where he is because of his sexuality is fucking stupid.

  • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Sorry drunk me after my best friend’s wedding

    I love Pete. He actually is amazing at his job. Fuckin avoiding a logistics disaster AND getting the union what they want? Putting the screws on Boeing? Fuck that guy can WORK IT. FUCK BEN GARRISON. I think we gotta say fuck the optics- that’s what makes us vote for centrists. And before Tankie’s get in and call him a fascist, y’all can go fuck a couch.

  • Cornpop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    They aren’t. Play it safe please. Moderate white male. Trump needs to be crushed.